S&P volume down 50% from Friday levels
::
Dow Jones Futures upside explosion - +1000
::
MS (Up 85%), GS (Up 20%) Continue to Make New Highs
::
GS Cuts Transocean's Price Target 58% to $75
::
Merrill Lowers MS '09 Price Target by $0.45 to $3.53
::
Merrill Cuts MS Price Target by $12 to $25
::
MS Now Up 73%, GS 18.7% Higher
::
Hambrecht urges help for small and medium sized banks
::
Hoyer - priority for next Congress - fiscal discipline
::
Hoyer - oversight will be priority of next Congress
::
Pelosi - economic stimulus needed
::
Pelosi - rescue package may not be big enough
::
JPM cut by C; stock down thru 200 day moving avg
::
Citi Widens JPM's Expected Q3 Loss to $0.32/Share
::
JPM's Q3 Results Likely Below Forecast-- Citi
::
Obama plan would allow $10k penalty free withdrawls from retirement funds
::
Dow Back Above 9000, Up 6.5% on the Day
::
UBS Cuts Visa's Price Target by $15 to $80
::
UBS Cuts Mastercard's Price Target by $20 to $240
::
GS At Highs of the Day, Back over $100, Up 13.6%
::

Username: Password: Forgotten your Password? Create an Account

Related Articles

BlackCat Trading Technologies’ Matthew Breakwell and John Reeve explain their distinctive approach to building a quantitative trading platform and outline their plans for exploiting it.

Cream Rising

Why did you start BlackCat and how would you describe your business model?

Breakwell: BlackCat was founded on a shared interest in quantitative trading that goes back to the late 1990s. For the last four years, we’ve been researching and developing the tools and technologies to support our trading, both in terms of strategy development tools and the trading platform and its supporting software. The aim now is to capitalise on the technology by establishing an investment management business to which BlackCat Trading Technologies will be the technical service provider. ...

Subscribers Only Content

This article is for subscribers only, please either log into your account above or click here to purchase a subscription for Automated Trader Magazine.

Registered viewers can post questions and discussion points about this article below

Discussion of articles is limited to registered users. Click here to register now click here to return to the top of the page

Evolving in the world of ever changing requirements for automated/algo based trading, could a Buy-Use strategy be adopted or an in house development be preferred (which however involves a huge time and cost disadvantage). Also the time value of money is huge. What could possible a optimal middle path to take advantage of both routes?
posted by Jagjeevan Rupainwar