And another thing Europe can’t agree about
First Published Thursday, 23rd February 2012 02:30 pm from Fidessa : Steve Grob
The opinions expressed by this blogger and those providing comments are theirs alone, this does not reflect the opinion of Automated Trader or any employee thereof. Automated Trader is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by this article.
Two stories this week demonstrated that Greece
isn't the only thing Europe has to disagree about.
Together they both help highlight the problem regulators have
worldwide with HFT. The first story,
target="_blank">by the FT's Jeremy Grant,
describes how Italy's Borsa Italiana is bowing to title="Consob"
href="http://www.consob.it/mainen/index.html?mode=gfx"
target="_blank">Consob pressure and introducing a
fee structure that will charge participants more depending upon
the number of orders they submit. This effectively introduces a
tax on the HFT community because their business model is
predicated on a much higher order to fill ratio. The rationale
for this is that HFT somehow distorts markets and so this is
needed in order to achieve "stability". And
yet, not so far away, the Swedish regulator claims that title="Sweden finds HFT effects limited"
href="http://jlne.ws/AiM6Vu" target="_blank">"the
negative effects related to high-frequency and algorithmic
trading are limited". Worse still is the
situation in Australia where the new ballooning regulation costs
are being divided up in accordance with the numbers of orders
submitted. Apparently this is not intended as a direct tax on HFT
but a way of reflecting the extra effort involved in supervising
these firms. The net effect, however, is just the same.
Part of the problem lies in coming up with a definition
of HFT that everyone agrees upon, but the real problem lies with
the regulators themselves. When they were busy introducing
multi-market structures, why didn't they think that
this would lead to a huge increase in HFT? Splitting liquidity
over multiple destinations and the subsequent introduction of
maker taker pricing provides the ideal breeding ground for
arbitrage. And, of course, exchanges around the world have been
busy building the fastest race tracks they can in order to
attract the same HFT players too.
Maybe it's
because HFT is such a nebulous concept that it becomes such an
easy scapegoat. Firms can always claim that any sanctions aren't
really directed at them but, just like Greece, I guess the debate
will go on forever.



