Fragulation Fever – 7 October 2009
First Published Thursday, 8th October 2009 02:06 pm from Fidessa : Fidessa
The opinions expressed by this blogger and those providing comments are theirs alone, this does not reflect the opinion of Automated Trader or any employee thereof. Automated Trader is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by this article.
Firstly thanks to everyone who has emailed me with such
positive responses to the Fragulator. Thousands of fragulations
have taken place on the site since Friday and it's
great to know that so many of you are finding it
useful.
We've had all sorts of
interesting feedback, especially in terms of the classifications
we have chosen and the different levels of reporting
transparency. A full guide to the different trade types can be
href="http://fragmentation.fidessa.com/faq/#tradetypes"
target="_blank">FAQ page but basically we still
classify a trade as lit provided that at least one side came from
a lit order book. So, for example, a dark order that interacts
with a lit order is still classified as a lit trade. You can see
this in the Fragulator tables which separate out dark to dark
interactions at Chi-Delta or Turquoise from other trades in their
lit books.
The bigger issue, though, is one of
transparency and the fact that dark and other non-lit venues
observe completely different levels of transparency. The
activities of the big broker dark pools have especially come in
for some stick in this area and I know that the primary exchanges
are crying foul at the regulators over this. Basically, their
view is that if you act like an exchange (i.e. by matching
orders), then you should have to report like an exchange. The
risk they claim is that, without a level playing field,
transparency goes down and Europe potentially becomes a dealer
market - neither of which were the intended consequences of
MiFID. On the other hand, the brokers claim that they are
providing a very necessary liquidity operation by allowing
traders to interact in their dark pools in different ways. It all
seems like the next chapter in a subtle power play between the
big exchanges on one side and the big banks and brokers on the
other.
Meanwhile, the folks at CESR are
getting lobbied from all sides on what is best for the market.
For more information on this you might want to look at title="FT Trading Room"
href="http://www.ft.com/cms/4683c1ac-71fd-11de-b7e1-00144feabdc0.html"
target="_blank">FT Trading room which features a
video interview with a certain shiny headed industry
observer.
It seems certain, though, that more
regulation is on the way. With this in mind it's
interesting to note the sudden outbreak of accord between the LSE
and the big banks over Turquoise. Maybe it's recognition that
these participants would rather sort out their own issues than
have the regulators do it for them.




