Asia Fragments or does it? – 4 October 2010
First Published Monday, 4th October 2010 02:06 pm from Fidessa : Steve Grob
The opinions expressed by this blogger and those providing comments are theirs alone, this does not reflect the opinion of Automated Trader or any employee thereof. Automated Trader is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by this article.
I participated in a series of Fragmentation Forums in
Asia last week. Just like previous events in Tokyo the events in
Hong Kong and Singapore were very well attended showing that
interest in fragmentation is now very much a global phenomenon.
One of the key messages that seemed to come out was that offering
better execution doesn't have to be driven by a
regulatory mandate. Instead, the drivers shaping the
buy/sell-side relationship in Asia are going to be the ability to
give customers choice and the ability for different brokers to
gain competitive advantage through smart order routing.
The other key message is that fragmentation will proceed
at different rates, and in different ways, across different Asian
countries. So, it seems that the consensus was that Japan and
Australia look like being fertile grounds for alternative lit
venues whilst other Asian countries would probably be dominated
by dark pools. As in the US and Europe, however, there is still
confusion over the discretionary pools operated by brokers and
the non-discretionary pools operated by exchanges and other
alternative venues. The first is simply an automation of the
traditional 'upstairs' trading activity by
brokers trying to find the other side for a trade. In this
instance, the broker is operating on a discretionary basis and
the value of the relationship he has with his client will be
reflected in the overall matching process. Venue operated dark
pools are non-discretionary in that trades will execute as long
as the appropriate criteria are met regardless. The problem is
that technology (and regulators) are making them appear more and
more alike when, in fact, there are subtle but significant
differences between them.
The final message
was that good old chestnut, clearing. As we saw in Europe,
multiple clearing venues can make it harder rather than simpler
to trade across multiple venues. This is because if different
venues are associated with different clearing operations then the
smart workflow between them is harder to accommodate. On the
other hand, a lot of lessons have been learned in Europe on this
one and so it may not prove such an obstacle in the medium
term.
If you want to find out more about Asian
trading generally then I would recommend you visit title="www.asiaetrading.com"
href="http://www.asiaetrading.com">www.asiaetrading.com.
It's full of interesting information about how markets
are structured in Asia and how they are developing. Also, Steve
Edge, who runs the site, provides a useful and entertaining
commentary on events across Asia - well worth a
look.
Finally, back in Europe looking forward
to seeing what happens in Spain now that some of the structural
obstacles are being removed. Spain certainly has a lot of ground
to make up as the FFI for its main index, the IBEX 35, is barely
over 1 whilst the same figure for the other major European
countries has been well over 2 for a long while now.



